How We Review Crypto Casinos — Our 10-Point Methodology
Every casino on this site goes through the same 10-point review process. No shortcuts, no exceptions. Here's exactly what we check and how we score it.
We developed this methodology because most crypto casino reviews are surface-level at best. Ours are based on first-hand testing with real deposits, measurable data, and a consistent framework you can hold us accountable to.
The 10-Point Review Framework
1. Licence Verification
We check the casino's claimed licence against the issuing regulator's public registry. A Curaçao eGaming licence is better than nothing, but it's not the same as a Malta Gaming Authority or Isle of Man licence. We verify the licence is active, correctly attributed to the operating entity, and not expired or revoked.
What we look for: Active licence number, matching legal entity, regulator reputation, any sanctions or enforcement actions.
2. Provably Fair Audit
For casinos that claim provably fair gaming, we don't take their word for it. We run actual bets through their system, capture the server seed, client seed, and nonce, then independently verify the outcome using the stated algorithm. If the maths doesn't check out, we say so.
What we look for: Verifiable algorithm, publicly documented method, correct implementation, third-party audit reports.
3. Deposit & Withdrawal Testing
This is where most review sites fall short — they never actually use the casino. We make real crypto deposits across multiple supported tokens and then request withdrawals. We measure the actual time from request to funds arriving in our wallet, not what the FAQ page claims.
What we look for: Actual deposit confirmation time, withdrawal processing time (hours, not "up to X days"), minimum withdrawal amounts, any hidden fees, whether withdrawals are processed in crypto or converted to fiat.
4. Bonus Terms Analysis
Welcome bonuses look generous until you read the fine print. We break down every bonus offer mathematically: what's the real wagering requirement? Which games contribute what percentage? What's the maximum bet while wagering? What's the time limit? What's the realistic expected value of the bonus?
What we look for: Wagering requirement (expressed as a multiplier), game contribution rates, maximum bet limits, time constraints, withdrawal caps on bonus winnings, restricted games.
5. Game Library & Provider Quality
A high game count means nothing if it's padded with low-quality titles. We assess the breadth of game categories (slots, table games, live dealer, crash games, sports) and the quality of providers (Pragmatic Play, Evolution, Hacksaw, etc.). We also check whether claimed game counts match reality.
What we look for: Number of providers, presence of top-tier providers, game category coverage, exclusive titles, live dealer quality and table limits.
6. Customer Support Responsiveness
We contact support with genuine questions via every available channel — live chat, email, and Telegram/Discord where offered. We time the response, assess the quality of the answer, and note whether we're talking to a human or a bot.
What we look for: Response time (live chat and email), accuracy of answers, availability hours, language support, whether they actually resolve the issue or just paste a template.
7. Mobile Experience
Most crypto casino players are on mobile. We test the full experience on iOS and Android: page load speed, game performance, deposit/withdrawal flow, navigation, and whether there's a native app or just a responsive site.
What we look for: Load time, touch-friendly interface, game compatibility, deposit flow on mobile, app availability, push notifications.
8. On-Chain Wallet Health Check
This is our data engineering edge. We examine the casino's known blockchain wallets to assess their financial health. A casino with thin reserves or erratic outflows is a higher risk of delayed withdrawals or insolvency. We check balances, transaction patterns, and any unusual activity.
What we look for: Hot wallet balances relative to player volume, consistent withdrawal processing, no large unexplained outflows, reserve transparency.
9. Community Sentiment Analysis
We monitor Reddit, Telegram groups, Trustpilot, and crypto gambling forums for real player feedback. A casino can look perfect on paper and still have widespread complaints about locked withdrawals or rigged outcomes. We weight recent sentiment more heavily than old reviews.
What we look for: Common complaint themes, withdrawal dispute patterns, response from the casino to complaints, community size and engagement, shill detection.
10. Historical Track Record & Red Flags
We research the casino's history: how long have they been operating? Have they ever been involved in a scandal? Changed ownership? Had a major hack or data breach? Been accused of withholding large withdrawals? Past behaviour is the best predictor of future behaviour.
What we look for: Operating history, ownership changes, security incidents, regulatory actions, controversy timeline, associated brands.
Our Rating Scale
Each of the 10 criteria is scored individually and then weighted into an overall rating on a 1–10 scale. Here's what each range means:
| Rating | Label | What It Means |
|---|---|---|
| 9.0 – 10.0 | Exceptional | Best-in-class across nearly every category. Very few casinos earn this. Reliable, transparent, and player-friendly. |
| 8.0 – 8.9 | Excellent | Strong across the board with minor weaknesses. We'd comfortably recommend these to experienced players. |
| 7.0 – 7.9 | Good | Solid option with some notable trade-offs. Good for players whose priorities align with the casino's strengths. |
| 6.0 – 6.9 | Decent | Functional but with clear shortcomings. Proceed with awareness of the weak points. |
| 5.0 – 5.9 | Below Average | Significant issues in multiple areas. Better alternatives exist for most players. |
| Below 5.0 | Avoid | Serious red flags — unresolved complaints, shady practices, or fundamental trust issues. We recommend staying away. |
How Weighting Works
Not all criteria are weighted equally. Safety-critical factors carry more weight:
- Licence verification — 15%
- Withdrawal testing — 15%
- On-chain wallet health — 12%
- Historical track record — 12%
- Provably fair audit — 10%
- Community sentiment — 10%
- Bonus terms analysis — 8%
- Customer support — 7%
- Game library — 6%
- Mobile experience — 5%
This weighting reflects our belief that trust and safety matter more than game variety or bonus size. A casino with great games but sketchy withdrawals will score lower than one with a smaller library but rock-solid payouts.
Re-Reviews & Updates
Casinos change. Bonus terms get worse, ownership changes hands, new features launch. We re-test casinos at least every six months and update our reviews accordingly. Every review page shows both the original date and the last update date.
If you notice something outdated in one of our reviews, let us know — we'll investigate and update.
Transparency Commitment
This methodology is public for a reason. We want you to know exactly how we arrive at our ratings so you can decide whether you trust our judgement. If you disagree with our weighting or approach, that's fair — at least you know what you're disagreeing with.